Recently I happened of comparison (the comparison is a bit euphemistic) with some regional offices for several construction projects characterized by a proportion of social housing (housing for low charge).
Nothing to complain on the portion of ERS. Some concerns, however, about the size of housing. Simple questions or, perhaps, reason to oppose. In any case, it was noted that social housing were a little 'small. And I can not confirm that: compared to the regional average of the housing stock occupied by residents (the average home has about 4 rooms), accommodation of ERS were smaller.
For the record, more than eighty per cento degli alloggi a canone moderato erano caratterizzati da una superficie utile (una sorta di superficie netta) compresa tra 42 e 51 mq: ampi bilocali oppure piccoli trilocali. Due alloggi avevano una superficie utile superiore ai 60 mq, cioè idonei ad accogliere un nucleo familiare di 4 persone.
Il ritorno sulla scena pubblica del tema della casa degli ultimi anni si scontra evidentemente non solo con problemi di finanza pubblica ma anche con problemi squisitamente progettuali. E magari è anche utile rifletterci un po’ sopra.
In primo luogo, si pone il problema dell’ appropriatezza response planning in relation to demand . Application for a social house that is not made by a family composed of ideal and desirable for a husband, wife and two children. But that is composed of a kaleidoscope of needs. And those needs are primarily represented-at least quantitatively-from small families: more than 69% of households living in the catchment area of \u200b\u200bthe projects mentioned above are composed of singles or pairs at most. It is said of old: the couple can also be a spouse separated from her son. But it is not the whole of Liguria to have this social stratification?
The same social composition is also in the smaller sample families living in housing managed by the four ERP ART Liguria. The singles are the 33.03% of recipients and couples are 34.21%, we arrive at 67.24%. In practice, the family structure that lives in social housing in Liguria is the same as living out of this restricted area. If we consider also the families of three residents, we come to a total of 86.09% of family assigned.
offer a four-for families and for 2 / 3 are composed of up to two people and that nearly 90% are below the four people, means going beyond what is strictly necessary. And much.
And then we see what it means to go beyond the ' Existenzminimum from the social point of view. I commend Andrea Villani ( here). said to me, however, sums up: resources are wasted even when they take out private individuals who make the building work. And since the shortage of housing relative to demand is a chronic problem, provide an abundant social response for only a few families is not just a clever bit. It's just a way to sharpen the discrimination between those who are over protected and who is not at all.
0 comments:
Post a Comment