a Home series of posts with purely local issues. In general, I am interested in the little blog that deal with issues limited. In reality, however, even so there is no way to address issues of more general scope.
In many areas of social life, in fact, there are few who think and speak as many are those that, in fact, we are addressing. At the local level, often who "think for others" is who has more time. So let's see.
About a city program complex (PRU accommodation fee for sustainable municipality of San Bartolomeo al mare) sees some interent building on existing PRG variant characterized by a proportion of social housing, one of the most persistent criticisms is related to the lack of opportunity to carry out urban variations. Better would be to rely on the wording of the new General Urban Tool.
In quantitative terms, the variant includes 65 additional housing, of which 25 are intended to ERS. In other words, more than 38% of additional housing stock is pursuing a markedly social purpose, without any special burdens on the public finances, both local and regional or state, since the financing solely on the social side is equal to about 17.4% cost recognizable.
The condition for achieving this result is, necessarily, also allow the construction of housing units free to make economically feasible micro specific actions. And the City, through specific variants, has greater bargaining power, as we are taught the now extensive experience of complex urban programs.
Let us see what would happen using the normal procedure of drafting the new PUC. In terms of local amenities such as ERS shares, would apply to a share due to which the provisions of artt.26 et seq. lr 38/07 and the SMI and ' Annex G PQR 2008-2011: the share of social housing required would have fallen to only 10% of its volume of building.
Under this option, therefore, to achieve the same result in terms of number of social housing, would It took more than 250 new homes, compared with 65 that were expected from the way typical of complex urban programs. An effort nearly four times higher.
Of course, the alternative could be to do nothing. There were 65 housing and, among these, there were not even the 25 social housing. Inaction is not new: the City does not have an accommodation only for the leasing office. Not because he has sold them. Not one has ever had.
The other alternative to achieve the same amount of social housing was a totally public investment of approximately € 3.3 million, to be located on areas to be expropriated. Considering that there is increasingly a problem to find € 50,000 more for some public work, the alternative may be fine, at most, for some campaigning.
0 comments:
Post a Comment