Dell'esperienza di un programma urbano complesso dedicato al social housing a San Bartolomeo al mare ho parlato alcune altre volte ( qui , ad esempio).
Lo stesso PRU, proprio a partire dalle maggiori critiche, è un buon banco di prova per comprendere le potenzialità di innovazione sul fronte della gestione urbanistica. Quindi, veniamo alle critiche: i vantaggi offerti dalla variazione del quadro urbanistico per i soggetti privati non compensano i vantaggi per il pubblico, rappresentati dalla produzione di alloggi sociali "chiavi in mano".
Maybe. But let's get some numbers to check.
tabular charges the City for the residential function, only in recent years, amounted to about € 167.50 per sqm built.
The interventions included in PRU provide not only the construction of housing che (or sustainable, if you prefer), but also the implementation of specific infrastructure works (including public parking spaces) to be sold to the City for free.
Considering the cost of construction of housing ERS and also the effect of the value of the area, adding this component to the more traditional cost of building works urbanization deductible under the different interventions, there is an impact on public counterparts each square meter of housing ranging from free € 931 / sqm to € 1,107 / sqm.
The average is estimated at approximately € 981 / sqm. Almost six times the cost tables. And especially not exactly indifferent-just have a vague idea of \u200b\u200bwhat the rent-in period of stagnant real estate market, that burden is reflected almost entirely on the owner of the area. In other words, the most "levy" in the form of public works in the public interest compresses the value of land.
result of little importance? Everyone has their own opinion. What is certain is that for a municipality since 1995 and for the next ten years (ie during the last boom real estate) held the concession fees in class C according to lr 25/95, that is equal to 60 € / sqm (progressively revalued with inflation), the PRU is already a great result. In the sense that now attaches to those who built up a good part of the costs resulting, without downloading them via ICI general taxation on second homes. Both the tourists do not vote.
But what now matters is the fact that the PRU, applying the established strategy of programs municipal complex, confers development rights by an assessment of public counterparts and in so doing makes the conditions of the local government to "tax" more than real estate action.
This was a pointed instrument, although the all to improve and develop the scheme, which seeks to provide a clear answer to the inadequacy of the current PRG in supporting local government in taking share of rent in order to turn them into social overhead capital. And the numbers seem to say that you are on the right track.
0 comments:
Post a Comment